<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ScanCrit.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scancrit.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scancrit.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RSI AND PERMISSIVE HYPOTENSION by nfkb</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/05/08/rsi-permissive-hypotension/#comment-7583</link>
		<dc:creator>nfkb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5422#comment-7583</guid>
		<description>hi,

i do not understand why they use 1,5 mg/kg of sux... some studies even suggest that 0,6 mg/kg is enough to intubate with less side effects

am i wrong ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,</p>
<p>i do not understand why they use 1,5 mg/kg of sux&#8230; some studies even suggest that 0,6 mg/kg is enough to intubate with less side effects</p>
<p>am i wrong ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RSI AND PERMISSIVE HYPOTENSION by Jakob Mathiszig-Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/05/08/rsi-permissive-hypotension/#comment-7424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Mathiszig-Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5422#comment-7424</guid>
		<description>My understanding is that KSS have gone to fentanyl, ketamine and roc for RSI&#039;s along with London and Ehaat precisely to blunt the hypertensive response to intubation. Will be interesting to see follow up data following the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that KSS have gone to fentanyl, ketamine and roc for RSI&#8217;s along with London and Ehaat precisely to blunt the hypertensive response to intubation. Will be interesting to see follow up data following the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RSI AND PERMISSIVE HYPOTENSION by Matt Wiles</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/05/08/rsi-permissive-hypotension/#comment-7401</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5422#comment-7401</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thanks for posting on an interesting topic, but I&#039;m afraid it misses the key points and there are notable misconceptions.

Opiates are actually rarely omitted in RSI inhospital; the reason they are not administered more in the prehospital setting is primarily due to logistical difficulties of controlled drug use. Opiates should NEVER be omitted on the basis the potential for failed intubation - if you think you won&#039;t be able to intubate the trachea then don&#039;t! If you undertake intubation you should have plans for failed intubation and CICV. In reality if a critically ill patient needs intubation then waking them up is rarely an option.

The use of opiates is particularly important in the head injured patient (which is the primary indication for intubation in most trauma patients). Permissive hypotension is NEVER used to minimise increases in ICP; hypotension in the context of TBI lowers cerebral perfusion pressure and dramatically increases morbidity and mortality. The key is to avoid hypertension (and thus increases in ICP secondary to increased CBF) by obtunding the stress response to laryngoscopy: this is most easily achieved with short acting opiates (remi/alf), but lidocaine and esmolol are alternatives.

Permissive hypotension is a controversial area which I have reviewed recently in an editorial (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.12249/abstract). Of note, all trials looking at its use excluded those with head injury. I have doubts of the efficacy of permissive hypotension and it is CONTRAINDICATED in patients with TBI.

Ketamine is the optimal drug for induction even in head injury as it prevents hypotension. If CO2 is controlled, ketamine has no effect on ICP. I find it hard to believe that people are continuing to use etomidate in the critically ill trauma patient in light of its effects on adrenal supression and subsequent increases in mortility. Ketamine produces the same intubating conditions for RSI without effects on the adrenal axis (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60949-1/abstract). 

The study you cite is worrying to me as a neuroanaesthetist - the aim of a trauma RSI is to have no effect of BP, either hypo- or hypertension. This group have failed their patients in 79% of cases.  In UK trauma (primarily blunt in nature, with a head injury rate of 40-60%) these data suggest the potential for harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting on an interesting topic, but I&#8217;m afraid it misses the key points and there are notable misconceptions.</p>
<p>Opiates are actually rarely omitted in RSI inhospital; the reason they are not administered more in the prehospital setting is primarily due to logistical difficulties of controlled drug use. Opiates should NEVER be omitted on the basis the potential for failed intubation &#8211; if you think you won&#8217;t be able to intubate the trachea then don&#8217;t! If you undertake intubation you should have plans for failed intubation and CICV. In reality if a critically ill patient needs intubation then waking them up is rarely an option.</p>
<p>The use of opiates is particularly important in the head injured patient (which is the primary indication for intubation in most trauma patients). Permissive hypotension is NEVER used to minimise increases in ICP; hypotension in the context of TBI lowers cerebral perfusion pressure and dramatically increases morbidity and mortality. The key is to avoid hypertension (and thus increases in ICP secondary to increased CBF) by obtunding the stress response to laryngoscopy: this is most easily achieved with short acting opiates (remi/alf), but lidocaine and esmolol are alternatives.</p>
<p>Permissive hypotension is a controversial area which I have reviewed recently in an editorial (<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.12249/abstract" rel="nofollow">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.12249/abstract</a>). Of note, all trials looking at its use excluded those with head injury. I have doubts of the efficacy of permissive hypotension and it is CONTRAINDICATED in patients with TBI.</p>
<p>Ketamine is the optimal drug for induction even in head injury as it prevents hypotension. If CO2 is controlled, ketamine has no effect on ICP. I find it hard to believe that people are continuing to use etomidate in the critically ill trauma patient in light of its effects on adrenal supression and subsequent increases in mortility. Ketamine produces the same intubating conditions for RSI without effects on the adrenal axis (<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60949-1/abstract" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60949-1/abstract</a>). </p>
<p>The study you cite is worrying to me as a neuroanaesthetist &#8211; the aim of a trauma RSI is to have no effect of BP, either hypo- or hypertension. This group have failed their patients in 79% of cases.  In UK trauma (primarily blunt in nature, with a head injury rate of 40-60%) these data suggest the potential for harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HELPING BABIES BREATHE by Thomas D</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/04/25/helping-babies-breathe/#comment-7337</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5250#comment-7337</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, and what you mention is certainly an important low resource intervention as well. There are many simple interventions like that available, and I think the beauty of the research done alongside implementing the Helping Babies Breathe program is that it documents the effect in hard endpoints, and over time. 

It is important to document impact like this, both for future funding and spread of these programs, but also as a reminder for us in high resource/high tech settings of how powerful simple interventions can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, and what you mention is certainly an important low resource intervention as well. There are many simple interventions like that available, and I think the beauty of the research done alongside implementing the Helping Babies Breathe program is that it documents the effect in hard endpoints, and over time. </p>
<p>It is important to document impact like this, both for future funding and spread of these programs, but also as a reminder for us in high resource/high tech settings of how powerful simple interventions can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HELPING BABIES BREATHE by David Hutchon</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/04/25/helping-babies-breathe/#comment-7328</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hutchon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5250#comment-7328</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is a very important program but as well as teaching the skill of ventilating a baby the teaching needs to ensure that the carers understand the importance of the placental circulation after birth and do not clamp the cord soon after the baby is born.  If the baby does need resuscitation and ventilation it can nearly always be done right by the mother with the cord intact as explained by Patrick van Rheenen in the BMJ editorial almost two years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is a very important program but as well as teaching the skill of ventilating a baby the teaching needs to ensure that the carers understand the importance of the placental circulation after birth and do not clamp the cord soon after the baby is born.  If the baby does need resuscitation and ventilation it can nearly always be done right by the mother with the cord intact as explained by Patrick van Rheenen in the BMJ editorial almost two years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RINGER&#8217;S A LOUSY VOLUME EXPANDER by nfkb</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/04/18/ringers-lousy-volume-expander/#comment-7267</link>
		<dc:creator>nfkb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5248#comment-7267</guid>
		<description>hi Thomas !

Actually when the patient is leaking and shocked i&#039;ve got a preference toward low concentration albumine (40g/l) and ringer/saline. 

Of course i keep in mind that everythink leaks and one important point is to teach resident to titrate the volume expansion and not prescribing it like sore throat pills

In the OR i mainly use RL (90% of the fluid i use) If the patient bleeds we have the blood and plasma really quick in our universitary hospital so i do not use HES or gelatine anymore. We also do a lot of hepatic and oncologic surgery so albumin take  its place in the operating theatre too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Thomas !</p>
<p>Actually when the patient is leaking and shocked i&#8217;ve got a preference toward low concentration albumine (40g/l) and ringer/saline. </p>
<p>Of course i keep in mind that everythink leaks and one important point is to teach resident to titrate the volume expansion and not prescribing it like sore throat pills</p>
<p>In the OR i mainly use RL (90% of the fluid i use) If the patient bleeds we have the blood and plasma really quick in our universitary hospital so i do not use HES or gelatine anymore. We also do a lot of hepatic and oncologic surgery so albumin take  its place in the operating theatre too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RINGER&#8217;S A LOUSY VOLUME EXPANDER by Thomas D</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/04/18/ringers-lousy-volume-expander/#comment-7265</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5248#comment-7265</guid>
		<description>I agree with you totally! This post is not against the use of Ringer&#039;s Lactate, it&#039;s just to remind us how it works physiologically when you infuse it, and to keep that in mind when treating patients.

We do the same in our ICU: RL (mainly to avoid chloride overload) and albumin 200 mg/ml or plasma as volume expanders. The middle way. Still, I sometimes wonder how much volume expansion colloids provide in critically ill patients with leaking vascular walls...

In the OT and also in the ICU HES and other colloids are still used as volume expanders for low risk, not so sick, patients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you totally! This post is not against the use of Ringer&#8217;s Lactate, it&#8217;s just to remind us how it works physiologically when you infuse it, and to keep that in mind when treating patients.</p>
<p>We do the same in our ICU: RL (mainly to avoid chloride overload) and albumin 200 mg/ml or plasma as volume expanders. The middle way. Still, I sometimes wonder how much volume expansion colloids provide in critically ill patients with leaking vascular walls&#8230;</p>
<p>In the OT and also in the ICU HES and other colloids are still used as volume expanders for low risk, not so sick, patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE GCS STILL DOES NOT BELONG IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE by ¿Sirve para algo la Escala de Coma de Glasgow? &#124; Ser Médico &#8211; El blog del Cuidado Médico</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/03/19/gcs-belong-emergency-medicine/#comment-7256</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Sirve para algo la Escala de Coma de Glasgow? &#124; Ser Médico &#8211; El blog del Cuidado Médico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5231#comment-7256</guid>
		<description>[...] The GCS Still does not belong in emergency medicine  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GCS Still does not belong in emergency medicine  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WHY THE GLASGOW COMA SCALE HAS GOT TO GO by ¿Sirve para algo la Escala de Coma de Glasgow? &#124; Medicina General y Salud Ocupacional</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2011/11/28/why-the-glasgow-coma-scale-has-got-to-go/#comment-7255</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Sirve para algo la Escala de Coma de Glasgow? &#124; Medicina General y Salud Ocupacional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=1006#comment-7255</guid>
		<description>[...]  Why the Glasgow Coma Scale has Got To Go [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Why the Glasgow Coma Scale has Got To Go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RINGER&#8217;S A LOUSY VOLUME EXPANDER by nfkb</title>
		<link>http://www.scancrit.com/2013/04/18/ringers-lousy-volume-expander/#comment-7243</link>
		<dc:creator>nfkb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scancrit.com/?p=5248#comment-7243</guid>
		<description>hi ! 

thank you for this post !

In our ICU we use a lot Ringer Lactate (i think it&#039;s better than saline looking at the chloride issue) and albumin @ 200 mg/ml because we have a lot of malnourished patients with deep hypoalbuminemia.

Despite good evidence we are pretty happy with this combo (the pharmacist is not hapy with the cost of albumin) so i think there&#039;s something to dig with the association of a balanced crystalloid and albumin. The middle way ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi ! </p>
<p>thank you for this post !</p>
<p>In our ICU we use a lot Ringer Lactate (i think it&#8217;s better than saline looking at the chloride issue) and albumin @ 200 mg/ml because we have a lot of malnourished patients with deep hypoalbuminemia.</p>
<p>Despite good evidence we are pretty happy with this combo (the pharmacist is not hapy with the cost of albumin) so i think there&#8217;s something to dig with the association of a balanced crystalloid and albumin. The middle way <img src='http://www.scancrit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
